<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Start-up Watch: Gear6 and Njini</title>
	<atom:link href="http://storagemojo.com/2006/07/18/start-up-watch-gear6-and-njini/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://storagemojo.com/2006/07/18/start-up-watch-gear6-and-njini/</link>
	<description>Data storage info &#38; analysis</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 15:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert Pearson</title>
		<link>http://storagemojo.com/2006/07/18/start-up-watch-gear6-and-njini/#comment-3616</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Pearson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 03:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagemojo.com/?p=196#comment-3616</guid>
		<description>With regard to the Gear6 approach...

The end result is the same for the Gear6 approach and one using 
Small Form Factor (SFF) PCs. The difference is scalability and the way 
the I/O bandwidth is flexed. 
Adding, or removing, an SFF PC can be as simple as turning it on or off, 
or adding it to or taking it off-network. 
At the Enterprise level, the real difference is server class motherboards versus SFF PC "workstation" class motherboards for I/O performance. 

In the Triangle of Unobtainium the choices are any two of the three 
corners of the triangle. Those corners are: 
1) Fast
2) Cheap 
3) Good 

Today "Fast and Cheap" is considered "Good enough (the 80% solution)". 
The SFF PC solution looks pretty good using a less than $100 for an SFF 
PC motherboard delivering RISC Workstation I/O perfomance. 

Think of this as the "I/O Swarm". This would be in support of the "Storage 
Swarm".

Now if I can only find some COTS Manageware?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With regard to the Gear6 approach&#8230;</p>
<p>The end result is the same for the Gear6 approach and one using<br />
Small Form Factor (SFF) PCs. The difference is scalability and the way<br />
the I/O bandwidth is flexed.<br />
Adding, or removing, an SFF PC can be as simple as turning it on or off,<br />
or adding it to or taking it off-network.<br />
At the Enterprise level, the real difference is server class motherboards versus SFF PC &#8220;workstation&#8221; class motherboards for I/O performance. </p>
<p>In the Triangle of Unobtainium the choices are any two of the three<br />
corners of the triangle. Those corners are:<br />
1) Fast<br />
2) Cheap<br />
3) Good </p>
<p>Today &#8220;Fast and Cheap&#8221; is considered &#8220;Good enough (the 80% solution)&#8221;.<br />
The SFF PC solution looks pretty good using a less than $100 for an SFF<br />
PC motherboard delivering RISC Workstation I/O perfomance. </p>
<p>Think of this as the &#8220;I/O Swarm&#8221;. This would be in support of the &#8220;Storage<br />
Swarm&#8221;.</p>
<p>Now if I can only find some COTS Manageware?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Pearson</title>
		<link>http://storagemojo.com/2006/07/18/start-up-watch-gear6-and-njini/#comment-3615</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Pearson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 02:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagemojo.com/?p=196#comment-3615</guid>
		<description>You've gotta love njini. 
I have. Since I first heard about it in 2005. 
The njini approach is the way to the Storage "Wave of the Future". 
Only time wil tell if njini is there for the long run. My guess is they will 
be bought by a really big fish soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve gotta love njini.<br />
I have. Since I first heard about it in 2005.<br />
The njini approach is the way to the Storage &#8220;Wave of the Future&#8221;.<br />
Only time wil tell if njini is there for the long run. My guess is they will<br />
be bought by a really big fish soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.343 seconds -->
