<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Best of Show at Storage Networking World</title>
	<atom:link href="http://storagemojo.com/2006/11/03/best-of-show-at-storage-networking-world/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://storagemojo.com/2006/11/03/best-of-show-at-storage-networking-world/</link>
	<description>Data storage info &#38; analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:02:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamon Bowen</title>
		<link>http://storagemojo.com/2006/11/03/best-of-show-at-storage-networking-world/comment-page-1/#comment-8288</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamon Bowen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 21:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagemojo.com/?p=298#comment-8288</guid>
		<description>Hi Robin,

Thanks for pointing out this question.

For that test I we were doing 8k Random Reads with a high outstanding IO count (40 total), Six 4 Gbps links from 1 host, a dual cpu dual core Opteron with QLogic HBAs.

The site below references that they use a RamSan-400 for the test and shows close to the performance you can get with one of the RamSan dual ported FC400 (4 Gbps) Controller for a variety of loads.  The RamSan-400 supports 4 FC400s (8 ports total) with active/active access from each port to any LUN in the RamSan.
 http://www.qlogic.com/documents/datasheets/knowledge_data/whitepapers/Scaling_SAN_Fabric.pdf 

The two limitations of the system (with maximum controllers) are 400,000 IOPS or 3 GB/s for any combination of reads/writes with varing block size.

Thanks!
Jamon Bowen
Sales Engineer
Texas Memory Systems, Inc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Robin,</p>
<p>Thanks for pointing out this question.</p>
<p>For that test I we were doing 8k Random Reads with a high outstanding IO count (40 total), Six 4 Gbps links from 1 host, a dual cpu dual core Opteron with QLogic HBAs.</p>
<p>The site below references that they use a RamSan-400 for the test and shows close to the performance you can get with one of the RamSan dual ported FC400 (4 Gbps) Controller for a variety of loads.  The RamSan-400 supports 4 FC400s (8 ports total) with active/active access from each port to any LUN in the RamSan.<br />
 <a href="http://www.qlogic.com/documents/datasheets/knowledge_data/whitepapers/Scaling_SAN_Fabric.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.qlogic.com/documents/datasheets/knowledge_data/whitepapers/Scaling_SAN_Fabric.pdf</a> </p>
<p>The two limitations of the system (with maximum controllers) are 400,000 IOPS or 3 GB/s for any combination of reads/writes with varing block size.</p>
<p>Thanks!<br />
Jamon Bowen<br />
Sales Engineer<br />
Texas Memory Systems, Inc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Harris</title>
		<link>http://storagemojo.com/2006/11/03/best-of-show-at-storage-networking-world/comment-page-1/#comment-8285</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 19:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagemojo.com/?p=298#comment-8285</guid>
		<description>Richard,

Good question that I wish I&#039;d thought of myself. I&#039;ve asked TMS to respond and I hope they do.

Robin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard,</p>
<p>Good question that I wish I&#8217;d thought of myself. I&#8217;ve asked TMS to respond and I hope they do.</p>
<p>Robin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://storagemojo.com/2006/11/03/best-of-show-at-storage-networking-world/comment-page-1/#comment-8235</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 06:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagemojo.com/?p=298#comment-8235</guid>
		<description>Robin,
As you say, a &#039; rigorously unscientific survey&#039;.

To comment on the 278,000 IOPS we need to know how &#039;small&#039; the transfers were, how many host channels  &amp; servers were involved and if this test was a read, write or a %  mixture of both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robin,<br />
As you say, a &#8216; rigorously unscientific survey&#8217;.</p>
<p>To comment on the 278,000 IOPS we need to know how &#8216;small&#8217; the transfers were, how many host channels  &amp; servers were involved and if this test was a read, write or a %  mixture of both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

