<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Infinite Density Storage @ the End of the Rainbow?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://storagemojo.com/2006/11/27/infinite-density-storage-the-end-of-the-rainbow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://storagemojo.com/2006/11/27/infinite-density-storage-the-end-of-the-rainbow/</link>
	<description>Data storage info &#38; analysis</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 15:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sainul Abideen.N</title>
		<link>http://storagemojo.com/2006/11/27/infinite-density-storage-the-end-of-the-rainbow/#comment-11602</link>
		<dc:creator>Sainul Abideen.N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagemojo.com/?p=316#comment-11602</guid>
		<description>Hello friends
   I am Sainul Abideen. Rainbow Starage is my work.
   Please read article on my web page www.kerlontech.com/RandD.html
   Pray for me and keep in touch
                                      Sainu</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello friends<br />
   I am Sainul Abideen. Rainbow Starage is my work.<br />
   Please read article on my web page <a href="http://www.kerlontech.com/RandD.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.kerlontech.com/RandD.html</a><br />
   Pray for me and keep in touch<br />
                                      Sainu</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Harris</title>
		<link>http://storagemojo.com/2006/11/27/infinite-density-storage-the-end-of-the-rainbow/#comment-10462</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 22:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagemojo.com/?p=316#comment-10462</guid>
		<description>Me, 

One would think so. 

And it appears that holography could get more than 256GB on an A4 sheet - if it were a few millimeters thick.

Robin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me, </p>
<p>One would think so. </p>
<p>And it appears that holography could get more than 256GB on an A4 sheet - if it were a few millimeters thick.</p>
<p>Robin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: me</title>
		<link>http://storagemojo.com/2006/11/27/infinite-density-storage-the-end-of-the-rainbow/#comment-10446</link>
		<dc:creator>me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 19:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagemojo.com/?p=316#comment-10446</guid>
		<description>if you could theoretically store this much data on a printed sheet of paper, then this would leave one to think that if it was possible, a raw image on an A4 sheet of paper would be 256 GB.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if you could theoretically store this much data on a printed sheet of paper, then this would leave one to think that if it was possible, a raw image on an A4 sheet of paper would be 256 GB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Harris</title>
		<link>http://storagemojo.com/2006/11/27/infinite-density-storage-the-end-of-the-rainbow/#comment-10407</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 05:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagemojo.com/?p=316#comment-10407</guid>
		<description>Oopa,

I'd love to agree, and I just can't. While one might imagine a pictographic system with 10,000 variations, including color, shape, width, etc., at some point those pictographs have to be rendered.  Since the guy was reported to say that these could be printed in magazines, we're talking about well-known processes that have definite limits: resolution, color, registration and more.

He was reported to have said that he could get 2 terabits on a single A4 sheet of paper, and short of holography, which is not a magazine printing processs, the resolution just doesn't exist.

I'd love to be proven wrong and I hope I am. Yet based on what has been reported, and I know how shaky reporters can be, it doesn't just seem difficult, it seems impossible.

Robin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oopa,</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to agree, and I just can&#8217;t. While one might imagine a pictographic system with 10,000 variations, including color, shape, width, etc., at some point those pictographs have to be rendered.  Since the guy was reported to say that these could be printed in magazines, we&#8217;re talking about well-known processes that have definite limits: resolution, color, registration and more.</p>
<p>He was reported to have said that he could get 2 terabits on a single A4 sheet of paper, and short of holography, which is not a magazine printing processs, the resolution just doesn&#8217;t exist.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to be proven wrong and I hope I am. Yet based on what has been reported, and I know how shaky reporters can be, it doesn&#8217;t just seem difficult, it seems impossible.</p>
<p>Robin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unsure the 2nd</title>
		<link>http://storagemojo.com/2006/11/27/infinite-density-storage-the-end-of-the-rainbow/#comment-10328</link>
		<dc:creator>Unsure the 2nd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 01:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagemojo.com/?p=316#comment-10328</guid>
		<description>Well, personally I think the idea could work. Spacial interpretation goes further than a 1 on 1 relationship of byte and colored dot, that hás to be, otherwise it will never work. 

As has been pointed out and calculated, a 1 on 1 relationship of colored dots and bytes will most probably won't be how it's done. The 4,7 Gb per Inch seems incredibly high, but I think you do need the whole paper to get that little part decoded into 4,7Gb of information, otherwise it seems very unlikely.

We must not forget by the way, that there have been previous storage compression inventions that had remarkable results, even some older kinds of technology seem to be able to extend their lives with enough research. Take for example Sun's tape and it's "record breaking" amount of storage.. yes, we are talking about petabytes here .. on tape .. :)  ( source: http://research.sun.com/minds/2006-0608/ )

Cheers,
Loopa</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, personally I think the idea could work. Spacial interpretation goes further than a 1 on 1 relationship of byte and colored dot, that hás to be, otherwise it will never work. </p>
<p>As has been pointed out and calculated, a 1 on 1 relationship of colored dots and bytes will most probably won&#8217;t be how it&#8217;s done. The 4,7 Gb per Inch seems incredibly high, but I think you do need the whole paper to get that little part decoded into 4,7Gb of information, otherwise it seems very unlikely.</p>
<p>We must not forget by the way, that there have been previous storage compression inventions that had remarkable results, even some older kinds of technology seem to be able to extend their lives with enough research. Take for example Sun&#8217;s tape and it&#8217;s &#8220;record breaking&#8221; amount of storage.. yes, we are talking about petabytes here .. on tape .. <img src='http://storagemojo.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  ( source: <a href="http://research.sun.com/minds/2006-0608/" rel="nofollow">http://research.sun.com/minds/2006-0608/</a> )</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Loopa</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.610 seconds -->
