<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Life is a sequential access workload</title>
	<atom:link href="http://storagemojo.com/2007/04/19/life-is-a-sequential-access-workload/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://storagemojo.com/2007/04/19/life-is-a-sequential-access-workload/</link>
	<description>Data storage info &#38; analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 13:26:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fidelity Case Study : Ardent Performance Computing</title>
		<link>http://storagemojo.com/2007/04/19/life-is-a-sequential-access-workload/comment-page-1/#comment-64472</link>
		<dc:creator>Fidelity Case Study : Ardent Performance Computing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 23:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagemojo.com/?p=436#comment-64472</guid>
		<description>[...] The big picture is that Fidelity migrated a 10TB data warehouse from DB2 to Oracle RAC. (Charles Kim was the lead on it.) Most of the data was unstructured PDF or XML stored in LOBs. Interestingly this is a perfect example of something that Robin Harris recently discussed on storagemojo&#8230; and then Kevin Closson picked up on his blog as well: that the future of storage is not IOPS or OLTP workloads; it&#8217;s capacity and unstructured data&#8230; think LOBs and sequential reads (or as Kevin pointed out, Oracle 11g Secure Files). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The big picture is that Fidelity migrated a 10TB data warehouse from DB2 to Oracle RAC. (Charles Kim was the lead on it.) Most of the data was unstructured PDF or XML stored in LOBs. Interestingly this is a perfect example of something that Robin Harris recently discussed on storagemojo&#8230; and then Kevin Closson picked up on his blog as well: that the future of storage is not IOPS or OLTP workloads; it&#8217;s capacity and unstructured data&#8230; think LOBs and sequential reads (or as Kevin pointed out, Oracle 11g Secure Files). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Closson's Oracle Blog: Platform, Storage &#38; Clustering Topics Related to Oracle Databases</title>
		<link>http://storagemojo.com/2007/04/19/life-is-a-sequential-access-workload/comment-page-1/#comment-55171</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Closson's Oracle Blog: Platform, Storage &#38; Clustering Topics Related to Oracle Databases</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 04:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagemojo.com/?p=436#comment-55171</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Big Drives Dislike Little Nibbles. Got Unstructured Data?&#160;Oracle11g!...&lt;/strong&gt;

I just read a nice piece by Robin Harris over at one of my favorite blogs, storagemojo.com, about large sequential I/Os being the future focus of storage. I think he is absolutely correct. Let’s face it; there is only so much data that can take that ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Big Drives Dislike Little Nibbles. Got Unstructured Data?&nbsp;Oracle11g!&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I just read a nice piece by Robin Harris over at one of my favorite blogs, storagemojo.com, about large sequential I/Os being the future focus of storage. I think he is absolutely correct. Let’s face it; there is only so much data that can take that &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jengates Blog &#187; links for 2007-04-19</title>
		<link>http://storagemojo.com/2007/04/19/life-is-a-sequential-access-workload/comment-page-1/#comment-53520</link>
		<dc:creator>Jengates Blog &#187; links for 2007-04-19</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 23:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagemojo.com/?p=436#comment-53520</guid>
		<description>[...] StorageMojo » Life is a sequential access workload (tags: storage) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] StorageMojo » Life is a sequential access workload (tags: storage) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jelloknee</title>
		<link>http://storagemojo.com/2007/04/19/life-is-a-sequential-access-workload/comment-page-1/#comment-53469</link>
		<dc:creator>Jelloknee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 19:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagemojo.com/?p=436#comment-53469</guid>
		<description>How disappointing that the future is a not a storage company ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How disappointing that the future is a not a storage company <img src='http://storagemojo.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

