<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Powering a warehouse-sized computer &#8211; part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://storagemojo.com/2007/07/26/powering-a-warehouse-sized-computer-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://storagemojo.com/2007/07/26/powering-a-warehouse-sized-computer-part-1/</link>
	<description>Data storage info &#38; analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 22:00:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Harris</title>
		<link>http://storagemojo.com/2007/07/26/powering-a-warehouse-sized-computer-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-101771</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 23:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagemojo.com/2007/07/26/powering-a-warehouse-sized-computer-part-1/#comment-101771</guid>
		<description>Cedric,

It isn&#039;t clear what benchmarks they used, but it seems like these are internal Google tests rather than a standard. &lt;strong&gt;Update:&lt;/strong&gt; The paper mentions in passing that
&lt;blockquote&gt;
. . . we run a suite of benchmarks that includes some of our most representative workloads as well as a few micro- benchmarks, under variable loads.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

OSGuy and Harold,

With hydro-power the dams have to let a certain amount of water through to keep the fish and fisherman happy. So if they can sell the power that water produces, it is a win. Otherwise it just rolls out to sea and the Bonneville Power Administration doesn&#039;t get a nickel for it.

Robin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cedric,</p>
<p>It isn&#8217;t clear what benchmarks they used, but it seems like these are internal Google tests rather than a standard. <strong>Update:</strong> The paper mentions in passing that</p>
<blockquote><p>
. . . we run a suite of benchmarks that includes some of our most representative workloads as well as a few micro- benchmarks, under variable loads.
</p></blockquote>
<p>OSGuy and Harold,</p>
<p>With hydro-power the dams have to let a certain amount of water through to keep the fish and fisherman happy. So if they can sell the power that water produces, it is a win. Otherwise it just rolls out to sea and the Bonneville Power Administration doesn&#8217;t get a nickel for it.</p>
<p>Robin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harold</title>
		<link>http://storagemojo.com/2007/07/26/powering-a-warehouse-sized-computer-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-101201</link>
		<dc:creator>Harold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 10:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagemojo.com/2007/07/26/powering-a-warehouse-sized-computer-part-1/#comment-101201</guid>
		<description>Open Systems Guy: I would imagine so.  Clearly, the power companies have already worked out protocols so that the demands of steel electric furnaces---used for e.g. scrap in the now wildly successful &quot;mini-mills&quot;, but also used long before them---are handled gracefully by the grid.

And for a plant like that, the cost of provisioning peak power is going to be significant, so charging in terms of it makes a lot of sense, especially since a mini-mill is I would guess going to normally run at near peak power.

Also, mini-mills with continuous rolling systems after the furnace and data-centers (at least the ones that never seem to have quite enough generator backup :-) are not going to be the first in line to volunteer for interruptible provisioning; you can get better rates if you allow the power company to have you shed load when their total peak gets too high.

- Harold</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Open Systems Guy: I would imagine so.  Clearly, the power companies have already worked out protocols so that the demands of steel electric furnaces&#8212;used for e.g. scrap in the now wildly successful &#8220;mini-mills&#8221;, but also used long before them&#8212;are handled gracefully by the grid.</p>
<p>And for a plant like that, the cost of provisioning peak power is going to be significant, so charging in terms of it makes a lot of sense, especially since a mini-mill is I would guess going to normally run at near peak power.</p>
<p>Also, mini-mills with continuous rolling systems after the furnace and data-centers (at least the ones that never seem to have quite enough generator backup <img src='http://storagemojo.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  are not going to be the first in line to volunteer for interruptible provisioning; you can get better rates if you allow the power company to have you shed load when their total peak gets too high.</p>
<p>- Harold</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cedric</title>
		<link>http://storagemojo.com/2007/07/26/powering-a-warehouse-sized-computer-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-101083</link>
		<dc:creator>Cedric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 13:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagemojo.com/2007/07/26/powering-a-warehouse-sized-computer-part-1/#comment-101083</guid>
		<description>Hi Robin,

The study mentioned a &#039;power intensive&#039; benchmarks... does this relate the SPEC benchmarks currently under construction or does it related to another benchmarks? 

Any paper or study for power intensive benchmarks ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Robin,</p>
<p>The study mentioned a &#8216;power intensive&#8217; benchmarks&#8230; does this relate the SPEC benchmarks currently under construction or does it related to another benchmarks? </p>
<p>Any paper or study for power intensive benchmarks ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Storage @ Work</title>
		<link>http://storagemojo.com/2007/07/26/powering-a-warehouse-sized-computer-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-100978</link>
		<dc:creator>Storage @ Work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 20:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagemojo.com/2007/07/26/powering-a-warehouse-sized-computer-part-1/#comment-100978</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Robin Harris has been paying attention to Google&#039;s data center power analysis work...&lt;/strong&gt;

Robin Harris, the StorageMojo, has a couple interesting posts on his ZDNet blog and his StorageMojo blog. If you are interested in this topic, I think both are worth a look see.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Robin Harris has been paying attention to Google&#8217;s data center power analysis work&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Robin Harris, the StorageMojo, has a couple interesting posts on his ZDNet blog and his StorageMojo blog. If you are interested in this topic, I think both are worth a look see&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open Systems Guy</title>
		<link>http://storagemojo.com/2007/07/26/powering-a-warehouse-sized-computer-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-100912</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Systems Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagemojo.com/2007/07/26/powering-a-warehouse-sized-computer-part-1/#comment-100912</guid>
		<description>I wonder why datacenters are not charged by the KWh like the rest of the world? I wonder if it&#039;s to keep them from overloading the grid with spikes of usage...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder why datacenters are not charged by the KWh like the rest of the world? I wonder if it&#8217;s to keep them from overloading the grid with spikes of usage&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anil Gupta</title>
		<link>http://storagemojo.com/2007/07/26/powering-a-warehouse-sized-computer-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-100702</link>
		<dc:creator>Anil Gupta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 04:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagemojo.com/2007/07/26/powering-a-warehouse-sized-computer-part-1/#comment-100702</guid>
		<description>Robin,

Ten days ago, I also covered this very paper (can be downloaded from http://labs.google.com/papers/power_provisioning.pdf) on my blog at http://andirog.blogspot.com/2007/07/power-consumption-of-google-services.html. Barraso previously published a paper in ACM Queue discussing how cost of powering a computing device exceeds the cost of hardware. Google also proposed a new spec for server power supply that is 90% efficient than the current ones with 60-70% efficiency.

Like you wrote before, Google treating its infrastructure as core operation is one of Google&#039;s competitive advantage over its competitors. Google also muddies the &quot;build vs buy&quot; and &quot;focus on your core business, let someone else worry about everything else&quot; debate. Isn&#039;t it.

Anil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robin,</p>
<p>Ten days ago, I also covered this very paper (can be downloaded from <a href="http://labs.google.com/papers/power_provisioning.pdf)" rel="nofollow">http://labs.google.com/papers/power_provisioning.pdf)</a> on my blog at <a href="http://andirog.blogspot.com/2007/07/power-consumption-of-google-services.html" rel="nofollow">http://andirog.blogspot.com/2007/07/power-consumption-of-google-services.html</a>. Barraso previously published a paper in ACM Queue discussing how cost of powering a computing device exceeds the cost of hardware. Google also proposed a new spec for server power supply that is 90% efficient than the current ones with 60-70% efficiency.</p>
<p>Like you wrote before, Google treating its infrastructure as core operation is one of Google&#8217;s competitive advantage over its competitors. Google also muddies the &#8220;build vs buy&#8221; and &#8220;focus on your core business, let someone else worry about everything else&#8221; debate. Isn&#8217;t it.</p>
<p>Anil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
