<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Free speech for corporate bloggers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://storagemojo.com/2007/08/14/free-speech-for-corporate-bloggers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://storagemojo.com/2007/08/14/free-speech-for-corporate-bloggers/</link>
	<description>Data storage info &#38; analysis</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ICT Space &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Just Say &#34;Thanks for Feedback&#34;</title>
		<link>http://storagemojo.com/2007/08/14/free-speech-for-corporate-bloggers/#comment-182747</link>
		<dc:creator>ICT Space &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Just Say &#34;Thanks for Feedback&#34;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 11:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagemojo.com/2007/08/14/free-speech-for-corporate-bloggers/#comment-182747</guid>
		<description>[...] I most probably will still be on blogging hiatus for few more weeks if not for the battle of the words among storage bloggers Robin Harris, Barry Burke, and others. I guess I got embroiled by making an observational comment on Robin&#8217;s Blog post resulting in pen-lashing from Storagezilla. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I most probably will still be on blogging hiatus for few more weeks if not for the battle of the words among storage bloggers Robin Harris, Barry Burke, and others. I guess I got embroiled by making an observational comment on Robin&#8217;s Blog post resulting in pen-lashing from Storagezilla. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kartik</title>
		<link>http://storagemojo.com/2007/08/14/free-speech-for-corporate-bloggers/#comment-107012</link>
		<dc:creator>Kartik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 21:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagemojo.com/2007/08/14/free-speech-for-corporate-bloggers/#comment-107012</guid>
		<description>Hi Tony,
Thanks for the link on IBM blogging policy - an excellent set of guidelines, reinforcing IMHO the points storageanarchist has been making about the responsibilites of corporate bloggers. As someone who is about to attempt blogging myself, this information is very timely and has helped me gain perspective on what to me are uncharted territories.

Cheers, Kartik.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tony,<br />
Thanks for the link on IBM blogging policy - an excellent set of guidelines, reinforcing IMHO the points storageanarchist has been making about the responsibilites of corporate bloggers. As someone who is about to attempt blogging myself, this information is very timely and has helped me gain perspective on what to me are uncharted territories.</p>
<p>Cheers, Kartik.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Shmoe</title>
		<link>http://storagemojo.com/2007/08/14/free-speech-for-corporate-bloggers/#comment-106968</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Shmoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 16:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagemojo.com/2007/08/14/free-speech-for-corporate-bloggers/#comment-106968</guid>
		<description>I agree, I don't think it's a first amendment issue, but Robin has a point when he says that even through the misinformation you can gain a useful insight into the storage industry, the products and the marketing. 

I think you have to consider the sophistication of the audience.  Your readers are either CIOs and IT professionals or storage industry insiders.  Anyone without the ability to evaluate a technological claim will be easy meat to any kind of marketing, I don't think blogs are any worse in that respect than straight advertising.

All that said, I agree with Barry when he says that all corporate communications need to be held to be the same standard of ethics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a first amendment issue, but Robin has a point when he says that even through the misinformation you can gain a useful insight into the storage industry, the products and the marketing. </p>
<p>I think you have to consider the sophistication of the audience.  Your readers are either CIOs and IT professionals or storage industry insiders.  Anyone without the ability to evaluate a technological claim will be easy meat to any kind of marketing, I don&#8217;t think blogs are any worse in that respect than straight advertising.</p>
<p>All that said, I agree with Barry when he says that all corporate communications need to be held to be the same standard of ethics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the storage anarchist</title>
		<link>http://storagemojo.com/2007/08/14/free-speech-for-corporate-bloggers/#comment-106921</link>
		<dc:creator>the storage anarchist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 11:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagemojo.com/2007/08/14/free-speech-for-corporate-bloggers/#comment-106921</guid>
		<description>Great point, Tony. IBM's blogging policy is in fact an excellent example of what I am trying to underscore. It specifically directs IBM bloggers to adhere to IBM's Business Conduct Guidelines, to "avoid misrepresentation" and even to treat blogging under the same rules of engagement as the BCG defines for "competing in the field" (the entire BCG can be found here http://www.ibm.com/investor/corpgovernance/cgbcg.phtml).

And I believe that's a policy that ALL bloggers should follow, not just Corporate-sponsored ones.

But I'm not suggesting doing anything to shut down the free exchange of opinions and perspectives in any manner - this is why we blog. I'm not asking corporate bloggers to spotlight the faults in their products - like you Robin, I enjoy the responsibility to help out with that. Most importantly, I never said anything about curtailing the commentary - you're putting words into my mouth there.

No, my only intent has been to underscore the importance of playing within the borders of honest and factual depictions of the products and topics we discuss - something most of us inherently do anyway. And collectively we have already demonstrated that we can indeed have lively and useful debate without anyone making false claims about the products they use, sell or compete with. 

That's all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great point, Tony. IBM&#8217;s blogging policy is in fact an excellent example of what I am trying to underscore. It specifically directs IBM bloggers to adhere to IBM&#8217;s Business Conduct Guidelines, to &#8220;avoid misrepresentation&#8221; and even to treat blogging under the same rules of engagement as the BCG defines for &#8220;competing in the field&#8221; (the entire BCG can be found here <a href="http://www.ibm.com/investor/corpgovernance/cgbcg.phtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.ibm.com/investor/corpgovernance/cgbcg.phtml</a>).</p>
<p>And I believe that&#8217;s a policy that ALL bloggers should follow, not just Corporate-sponsored ones.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;m not suggesting doing anything to shut down the free exchange of opinions and perspectives in any manner - this is why we blog. I&#8217;m not asking corporate bloggers to spotlight the faults in their products - like you Robin, I enjoy the responsibility to help out with that. Most importantly, I never said anything about curtailing the commentary - you&#8217;re putting words into my mouth there.</p>
<p>No, my only intent has been to underscore the importance of playing within the borders of honest and factual depictions of the products and topics we discuss - something most of us inherently do anyway. And collectively we have already demonstrated that we can indeed have lively and useful debate without anyone making false claims about the products they use, sell or compete with. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Pearson</title>
		<link>http://storagemojo.com/2007/08/14/free-speech-for-corporate-bloggers/#comment-106825</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Pearson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 00:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagemojo.com/2007/08/14/free-speech-for-corporate-bloggers/#comment-106825</guid>
		<description>Robin, well said!

Of course, each company has their own policies on blogging, here is IBM's:
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/jasnell?entry=blogging_ibm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robin, well said!</p>
<p>Of course, each company has their own policies on blogging, here is IBM&#8217;s:<br />
<a href="http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/jasnell?entry=blogging_ibm" rel="nofollow">http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/jasnell?entry=blogging_ibm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the storage anarchist</title>
		<link>http://storagemojo.com/2007/08/14/free-speech-for-corporate-bloggers/#comment-106730</link>
		<dc:creator>the storage anarchist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagemojo.com/2007/08/14/free-speech-for-corporate-bloggers/#comment-106730</guid>
		<description>I think you twisted my position a bit. Perhaps you will allow me to clarify: http://thestorageanarchist.typepad.com/weblog/2007/08/0026-free-speec.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you twisted my position a bit. Perhaps you will allow me to clarify: <a href="http://thestorageanarchist.typepad.com/weblog/2007/08/0026-free-speec.html" rel="nofollow">http://thestorageanarchist.typepad.com/weblog/2007/08/0026-free-speec.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.275 seconds -->
