<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Notebook SSDs are dead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://storagemojo.com/2008/07/02/notebook-ssds-are-dead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://storagemojo.com/2008/07/02/notebook-ssds-are-dead/</link>
	<description>Data storage info &#38; analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:54:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Watkins</title>
		<link>http://storagemojo.com/2008/07/02/notebook-ssds-are-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-207972</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Watkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 06:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagemojo.com/?p=730#comment-207972</guid>
		<description>THIS BLOG ENTRY IS INVALID!
Tomshardware.com has admitted that the &quot;The SSD Power Consumption Hoax&quot; article was not done correctly. They admitted this in a follow-up article named:&quot;Flash SSD Update: More Results, Answers&quot; URL::
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ssd-hard-drive,1968.html

Exercpt::
&quot;First of all, we want to take this opportunity and apologize to our readers, for we made a procedural mistake when we compared battery runtime of various Flash SSDs, which we used to replace a 7,200 RPM hard drive on a business notebook in an effort to compare battery life of SSDs versus a conventional hard drive. As it was commented by our readers (see comments of that article) and other sources (thanks, George), part of the test procedure was inaccurate because of varying workload. This may cause other system components such as the CPU to be used more intensively, hence contributing to draining the battery earlier than on a slower drive.

The conclusion, however, that Flash SSDs are often misleadingly presented as energy savers to increase your battery mileage on notebooks, is not invalidated. The truth is that more and more Flash SSDs will be increasingly efficient. But many conventional hard drives can also be more efficient than today’s Flash SSDs in the scenarios some of you were demanding: when providing data under a defined workload such as video playback or in idle until the notebook battery runs empty.&quot;



Observe how power efficient the Intel G2 MLC SSD is and the performance it delivers, not to mention the slew of new SSDs from OCZ, Memoright and others. These solid state storage devices will only get more efficient in time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THIS BLOG ENTRY IS INVALID!<br />
Tomshardware.com has admitted that the &#8220;The SSD Power Consumption Hoax&#8221; article was not done correctly. They admitted this in a follow-up article named:&#8221;Flash SSD Update: More Results, Answers&#8221; URL::<br />
<a href="http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ssd-hard-drive,1968.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ssd-hard-drive,1968.html</a></p>
<p>Exercpt::<br />
&#8220;First of all, we want to take this opportunity and apologize to our readers, for we made a procedural mistake when we compared battery runtime of various Flash SSDs, which we used to replace a 7,200 RPM hard drive on a business notebook in an effort to compare battery life of SSDs versus a conventional hard drive. As it was commented by our readers (see comments of that article) and other sources (thanks, George), part of the test procedure was inaccurate because of varying workload. This may cause other system components such as the CPU to be used more intensively, hence contributing to draining the battery earlier than on a slower drive.</p>
<p>The conclusion, however, that Flash SSDs are often misleadingly presented as energy savers to increase your battery mileage on notebooks, is not invalidated. The truth is that more and more Flash SSDs will be increasingly efficient. But many conventional hard drives can also be more efficient than today’s Flash SSDs in the scenarios some of you were demanding: when providing data under a defined workload such as video playback or in idle until the notebook battery runs empty.&#8221;</p>
<p>Observe how power efficient the Intel G2 MLC SSD is and the performance it delivers, not to mention the slew of new SSDs from OCZ, Memoright and others. These solid state storage devices will only get more efficient in time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Serious Sidius</title>
		<link>http://storagemojo.com/2008/07/02/notebook-ssds-are-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-204706</link>
		<dc:creator>Serious Sidius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagemojo.com/?p=730#comment-204706</guid>
		<description>I agree that SSDs are not quite the &quot;better storage&quot; we were looking for.  They also want to claim &quot;data integrity&quot; but keep dropping the bar from 100 years with SLC to 10 or even 5 years with MLC.  So I can keep my hard disk in a box for 20 years and come back to find my data intact, not so with newer flash.

&quot;Hi there. Sega is going to release the first solid state flash drive gaming console which will probably take millions of hard core games away from Sony and Microsoft&quot;
You mean like the master system or genesis?
Cartridges are eeprom-based (flash), you realize that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that SSDs are not quite the &#8220;better storage&#8221; we were looking for.  They also want to claim &#8220;data integrity&#8221; but keep dropping the bar from 100 years with SLC to 10 or even 5 years with MLC.  So I can keep my hard disk in a box for 20 years and come back to find my data intact, not so with newer flash.</p>
<p>&#8220;Hi there. Sega is going to release the first solid state flash drive gaming console which will probably take millions of hard core games away from Sony and Microsoft&#8221;<br />
You mean like the master system or genesis?<br />
Cartridges are eeprom-based (flash), you realize that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james   braselton</title>
		<link>http://storagemojo.com/2008/07/02/notebook-ssds-are-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-199493</link>
		<dc:creator>james   braselton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 19:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagemojo.com/?p=730#comment-199493</guid>
		<description>Hi there. Sega is going to release   the  first   solid   state  flash drive  gaming  console   which  will probably  take   millions  of  hard  core   games away from Sony and Microsoft</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there. Sega is going to release   the  first   solid   state  flash drive  gaming  console   which  will probably  take   millions  of  hard  core   games away from Sony and Microsoft</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james  braselton</title>
		<link>http://storagemojo.com/2008/07/02/notebook-ssds-are-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-199422</link>
		<dc:creator>james  braselton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 15:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagemojo.com/?p=730#comment-199422</guid>
		<description>Hi  there  Apple  has  added   a   256  GB  SSD  flash  drive  for  their  13 inch MacBook  and  their  15  inch  MacBook  Pro  has  the  256   GB  SSD  option  as  well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi  there  Apple  has  added   a   256  GB  SSD  flash  drive  for  their  13 inch MacBook  and  their  15  inch  MacBook  Pro  has  the  256   GB  SSD  option  as  well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james  braselton</title>
		<link>http://storagemojo.com/2008/07/02/notebook-ssds-are-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-199278</link>
		<dc:creator>james  braselton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 19:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagemojo.com/?p=730#comment-199278</guid>
		<description>Hi   there    Apple  17  Inch  Mac  Book  Pro   has  a  256  GB   SSD   for  $900  and  at  New  Egg   you  can  buy  a  2.5  inch  256  GB   SSD  $499    soo  SDD  are  not  done  for  yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi   there    Apple  17  Inch  Mac  Book  Pro   has  a  256  GB   SSD   for  $900  and  at  New  Egg   you  can  buy  a  2.5  inch  256  GB   SSD  $499    soo  SDD  are  not  done  for  yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james  braselton</title>
		<link>http://storagemojo.com/2008/07/02/notebook-ssds-are-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-198848</link>
		<dc:creator>james  braselton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 03:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagemojo.com/?p=730#comment-198848</guid>
		<description>Hi  there  you  are  worng  ssd  are  just  now  taking  off  sony  and  alien  ware  offer  256  gb  ssd  for  $1,300  and  sony  apple   and  dell  have  128  gb  ssd   for  about  $500  soo  soner  or  later  the  hard  core  gamers  advantaly  put  hard  drive  sells  too  zero   i   say  in  about  22   years  from   know  no  one  will  know  what  a  hard  drive  is  just  like  the  floppy  drive  and  dail  up  modems</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi  there  you  are  worng  ssd  are  just  now  taking  off  sony  and  alien  ware  offer  256  gb  ssd  for  $1,300  and  sony  apple   and  dell  have  128  gb  ssd   for  about  $500  soo  soner  or  later  the  hard  core  gamers  advantaly  put  hard  drive  sells  too  zero   i   say  in  about  22   years  from   know  no  one  will  know  what  a  hard  drive  is  just  like  the  floppy  drive  and  dail  up  modems</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://storagemojo.com/2008/07/02/notebook-ssds-are-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-197899</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 14:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagemojo.com/?p=730#comment-197899</guid>
		<description>Just a remarkable example, beyond extreme speed increase by booting and random IO, SSDs are more robust devices, I am working in hard enviroemnts and this is the 5th time in 2 years that I changed my 2.5 inch rotating notebook drive because of bad sector and malfunctioning because of vibration. With SSD no trouble even when working near a press brake vibrating at 20HZ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a remarkable example, beyond extreme speed increase by booting and random IO, SSDs are more robust devices, I am working in hard enviroemnts and this is the 5th time in 2 years that I changed my 2.5 inch rotating notebook drive because of bad sector and malfunctioning because of vibration. With SSD no trouble even when working near a press brake vibrating at 20HZ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://storagemojo.com/2008/07/02/notebook-ssds-are-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-196783</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 03:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagemojo.com/?p=730#comment-196783</guid>
		<description>Antonio: &quot;NAND prices keep going down and SSDs too.&quot;

Do you think HDD prices and performance are standing still. There just isn&#039;t going to be parity in these competing products any time soon (next 5-8 years i.m.h.o.)  So when either side claims a superiority, it seems fundamental to question and attempt to prove the claim. Flash (SSDs) will improve with maturity, without doubt. And inherent qualities in flash will bring improvements to users. But this whole debate has been attended by much hype and the usual caveats should be heeded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Antonio: &#8220;NAND prices keep going down and SSDs too.&#8221;</p>
<p>Do you think HDD prices and performance are standing still. There just isn&#8217;t going to be parity in these competing products any time soon (next 5-8 years i.m.h.o.)  So when either side claims a superiority, it seems fundamental to question and attempt to prove the claim. Flash (SSDs) will improve with maturity, without doubt. And inherent qualities in flash will bring improvements to users. But this whole debate has been attended by much hype and the usual caveats should be heeded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: antonio</title>
		<link>http://storagemojo.com/2008/07/02/notebook-ssds-are-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-196680</link>
		<dc:creator>antonio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 22:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagemojo.com/?p=730#comment-196680</guid>
		<description>hi, I find strange you say ssd is dead. Startup times when loading programs or documents can be very good =&gt; they can make you win time and the money you wasted if you work much at your pc/laptop. If they were cheaper they would be preferred absolutely over hdd by the regular users.  Many who use the pc to work not in multimedia doesn&#039;t care about the capacity. And even the capacity could be not a problem if ssd gets bigger. Everything is going smoothly, and prehistoric spinning hard drives are the ones who are dead. I don&#039;t understand why are you hesitant about a new good technology. Most people seems to be excited. May be even samsung in its next offering will aready lower the prices fast, even more han ocz recently did. Am waiting for it. NAND prices keep going down and SSDs too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi, I find strange you say ssd is dead. Startup times when loading programs or documents can be very good =&gt; they can make you win time and the money you wasted if you work much at your pc/laptop. If they were cheaper they would be preferred absolutely over hdd by the regular users.  Many who use the pc to work not in multimedia doesn&#8217;t care about the capacity. And even the capacity could be not a problem if ssd gets bigger. Everything is going smoothly, and prehistoric spinning hard drives are the ones who are dead. I don&#8217;t understand why are you hesitant about a new good technology. Most people seems to be excited. May be even samsung in its next offering will aready lower the prices fast, even more han ocz recently did. Am waiting for it. NAND prices keep going down and SSDs too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thinking sysadmin &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Catch-up Links, 7/9/2008</title>
		<link>http://storagemojo.com/2008/07/02/notebook-ssds-are-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-196599</link>
		<dc:creator>thinking sysadmin &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Catch-up Links, 7/9/2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 18:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagemojo.com/?p=730#comment-196599</guid>
		<description>[...] to keep you from updating your blog. But on the bright side, I didn&#8217;t have to link to the notebook SSDs are dead - no they&#8217;re not [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to keep you from updating your blog. But on the bright side, I didn&#8217;t have to link to the notebook SSDs are dead &#8211; no they&#8217;re not [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fazal Majid</title>
		<link>http://storagemojo.com/2008/07/02/notebook-ssds-are-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-196578</link>
		<dc:creator>Fazal Majid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 14:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagemojo.com/?p=730#comment-196578</guid>
		<description>I have a MacBook Air with the SSD option. It boots so fast I am considering getting  a SSD as the boot drive for my next desktop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a MacBook Air with the SSD option. It boots so fast I am considering getting  a SSD as the boot drive for my next desktop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Kraska</title>
		<link>http://storagemojo.com/2008/07/02/notebook-ssds-are-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-196557</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Kraska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 03:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagemojo.com/?p=730#comment-196557</guid>
		<description>I think it might behoove the various readers of Robin&#039;s article to go over to the Tom&#039;s Hardware original story and read the comments in detail. It seems to me that we&#039;re not readily able to discern much here quite yet.

Joe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it might behoove the various readers of Robin&#8217;s article to go over to the Tom&#8217;s Hardware original story and read the comments in detail. It seems to me that we&#8217;re not readily able to discern much here quite yet.</p>
<p>Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gayle</title>
		<link>http://storagemojo.com/2008/07/02/notebook-ssds-are-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-196542</link>
		<dc:creator>Gayle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 19:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagemojo.com/?p=730#comment-196542</guid>
		<description>Seems odd that the company that was first to the market with MLC SSD&#039;s and recently knocked Samsung out of a lucrative Apple contract should have been tested. I think Apple probably ran as many tests as TOM&quot;S. STEC SSD&#039;s are superior and it directly relates to their controller technology and testing procedures .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems odd that the company that was first to the market with MLC SSD&#8217;s and recently knocked Samsung out of a lucrative Apple contract should have been tested. I think Apple probably ran as many tests as TOM&#8221;S. STEC SSD&#8217;s are superior and it directly relates to their controller technology and testing procedures .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes Felter</title>
		<link>http://storagemojo.com/2008/07/02/notebook-ssds-are-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-196541</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes Felter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 18:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagemojo.com/?p=730#comment-196541</guid>
		<description>A different test with a different result:

http://blog.laptopmag.com/web-surfing-test-shows-ssds-better-for-battery-life</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A different test with a different result:</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.laptopmag.com/web-surfing-test-shows-ssds-better-for-battery-life" rel="nofollow">http://blog.laptopmag.com/web-surfing-test-shows-ssds-better-for-battery-life</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
