<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Atmos architect moves on</title>
	<atom:link href="http://storagemojo.com/2010/03/08/atmos-architect-moves-on/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://storagemojo.com/2010/03/08/atmos-architect-moves-on/</link>
	<description>Data storage info &#38; analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 13:26:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Kraska</title>
		<link>http://storagemojo.com/2010/03/08/atmos-architect-moves-on/comment-page-1/#comment-208611</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Kraska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 12:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagemojo.com/?p=1932#comment-208611</guid>
		<description>Um. Atmos is quietly selling to a discrete set of buyers in large volumes, guys. It sells  in very large lots (multi petabyte procurements). You have to understand the edge case it is most appropriate for: files (not blocks), requirements for 2-3 replicates, and an integrated dissemination architecture. It&#039;s purpose-built to handle the world-wide file distribution problem of many web companies. It&#039;s NOT purpose-built to be a drop in replacement for all of EMC&#039;s other storage, so it should be no surprise that it is selling to its niche.

Joe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um. Atmos is quietly selling to a discrete set of buyers in large volumes, guys. It sells  in very large lots (multi petabyte procurements). You have to understand the edge case it is most appropriate for: files (not blocks), requirements for 2-3 replicates, and an integrated dissemination architecture. It&#8217;s purpose-built to handle the world-wide file distribution problem of many web companies. It&#8217;s NOT purpose-built to be a drop in replacement for all of EMC&#8217;s other storage, so it should be no surprise that it is selling to its niche.</p>
<p>Joe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angus</title>
		<link>http://storagemojo.com/2010/03/08/atmos-architect-moves-on/comment-page-1/#comment-208557</link>
		<dc:creator>Angus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagemojo.com/?p=1932#comment-208557</guid>
		<description>Seems to me that Atmos is going the way of Centera. A sales force that basically refuses to sell it, the inveitable down-turn in sales,  the good guys see the writing on the wall and finally....well just to say lucky for Atmos that they don&#039;t have engineering in Belgium.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to me that Atmos is going the way of Centera. A sales force that basically refuses to sell it, the inveitable down-turn in sales,  the good guys see the writing on the wall and finally&#8230;.well just to say lucky for Atmos that they don&#8217;t have engineering in Belgium.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damir Lukic</title>
		<link>http://storagemojo.com/2010/03/08/atmos-architect-moves-on/comment-page-1/#comment-208550</link>
		<dc:creator>Damir Lukic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagemojo.com/?p=1932#comment-208550</guid>
		<description>I like the idea behind Atmos, but it seems like it&#039;s not Atmos&#039;s time now. Especially when V-Max boxes are around for less than a year, and are demolishing the competition. I can understand EMC&#039;s decision to sell as many V-Max boxes as possible, and not some cloud storage in the era when we don&#039;t know what will happen to cloud technology at all.

But, again, this could be either good or bad decision. We&#039;ll have to wait and see what will happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea behind Atmos, but it seems like it&#8217;s not Atmos&#8217;s time now. Especially when V-Max boxes are around for less than a year, and are demolishing the competition. I can understand EMC&#8217;s decision to sell as many V-Max boxes as possible, and not some cloud storage in the era when we don&#8217;t know what will happen to cloud technology at all.</p>
<p>But, again, this could be either good or bad decision. We&#8217;ll have to wait and see what will happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris M Evans</title>
		<link>http://storagemojo.com/2010/03/08/atmos-architect-moves-on/comment-page-1/#comment-208535</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris M Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 12:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagemojo.com/?p=1932#comment-208535</guid>
		<description>Robin

Although I can see what EMC are trying to achieve, I think there are fundamental roadblocks in the way of people&#039;s view of Atmos.  That&#039;s mainly because they have a historic view on how storage should be offered, making thinking into the future more difficult.  For me, the biggest hurdle has been the removal of RAID from the architecture.  I don&#039;t want to write data to a storage device that has hundreds/thousands of disk devices in it and have one of them fail just as I write my data.  OK, I can replicate data to other nodes, but that&#039;s asynchronous and data can be lost in that time.

I think it will be the case that Atmos will require more deployments and good news stories before it gains widespread acceptance.  Otherwise it could be another inVista.

Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robin</p>
<p>Although I can see what EMC are trying to achieve, I think there are fundamental roadblocks in the way of people&#8217;s view of Atmos.  That&#8217;s mainly because they have a historic view on how storage should be offered, making thinking into the future more difficult.  For me, the biggest hurdle has been the removal of RAID from the architecture.  I don&#8217;t want to write data to a storage device that has hundreds/thousands of disk devices in it and have one of them fail just as I write my data.  OK, I can replicate data to other nodes, but that&#8217;s asynchronous and data can be lost in that time.</p>
<p>I think it will be the case that Atmos will require more deployments and good news stories before it gains widespread acceptance.  Otherwise it could be another inVista.</p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

