<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ZFS: Threat or Menace? Pt. I</title>
	<atom:link href="http://storagemojo.com/zfs-threat-or-menace-pt-i/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://storagemojo.com</link>
	<description>Data storage info &#38; analysis</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 12:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ivan R.</title>
		<link>http://storagemojo.com/zfs-threat-or-menace-pt-i/#comment-195983</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 08:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagemojo.com/?page_id=122#comment-195983</guid>
		<description>Oisin:

Yes, the new chechsums all the way up to the top of the pool will be written.  But ZFS is all copy-on-write, so new disk blocks will be used to store them, so the head doesn't have to seek all over.  Also ZFS will batches up I/O operations into transaction groups, so the whole batch will be flushed out to disk in one pass, rather than several smaller writes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oisin:</p>
<p>Yes, the new chechsums all the way up to the top of the pool will be written.  But ZFS is all copy-on-write, so new disk blocks will be used to store them, so the head doesn&#8217;t have to seek all over.  Also ZFS will batches up I/O operations into transaction groups, so the whole batch will be flushed out to disk in one pass, rather than several smaller writes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oisín</title>
		<link>http://storagemojo.com/zfs-threat-or-menace-pt-i/#comment-195979</link>
		<dc:creator>Oisín</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagemojo.com/?page_id=122#comment-195979</guid>
		<description>If the checksum of a block is stored in its parent block, doesn't this mean changing the contents of a node deep in the tree forces its parent to update its checksum, which in turn forces ITS parent to update its checksum, all the way back up the tree? Wouldn't this take a long time?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the checksum of a block is stored in its parent block, doesn&#8217;t this mean changing the contents of a node deep in the tree forces its parent to update its checksum, which in turn forces ITS parent to update its checksum, all the way back up the tree? Wouldn&#8217;t this take a long time?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Val</title>
		<link>http://storagemojo.com/zfs-threat-or-menace-pt-i/#comment-111609</link>
		<dc:creator>Val</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 11:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagemojo.com/?page_id=122#comment-111609</guid>
		<description>MIke

I guess it's possible... question of network routing.... but giganet is still quit slow I find maybe combining 2 or more gigabit ethernet cards together.... or bether fiberchannel ?? [$$$]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MIke</p>
<p>I guess it&#8217;s possible&#8230; question of network routing&#8230;. but giganet is still quit slow I find maybe combining 2 or more gigabit ethernet cards together&#8230;. or bether fiberchannel ?? [$$$]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Manh</title>
		<link>http://storagemojo.com/zfs-threat-or-menace-pt-i/#comment-27981</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Manh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 21:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagemojo.com/?page_id=122#comment-27981</guid>
		<description>So riddle me this: What if I had used a bunch of computers to make a local software Z Raid. Can I use a master computer to connect to those computers over a network, pool the storage, and present a storage pool to other computers looking to use a shared self healing storage device?

let's say i use a different network interface for that so that the master talking to the other storage computers was doing it over a separate network than everyone else. That way i wouldn't be bogging down the network interface with twice the traffic. This would be my poor man's SAN. I don't understand ZFS well enough to understand if you can pool networked other pools, so I guess that's my question. Is it possible?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So riddle me this: What if I had used a bunch of computers to make a local software Z Raid. Can I use a master computer to connect to those computers over a network, pool the storage, and present a storage pool to other computers looking to use a shared self healing storage device?</p>
<p>let&#8217;s say i use a different network interface for that so that the master talking to the other storage computers was doing it over a separate network than everyone else. That way i wouldn&#8217;t be bogging down the network interface with twice the traffic. This would be my poor man&#8217;s SAN. I don&#8217;t understand ZFS well enough to understand if you can pool networked other pools, so I guess that&#8217;s my question. Is it possible?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OsMoSiS &#187; Un NAS in casa</title>
		<link>http://storagemojo.com/zfs-threat-or-menace-pt-i/#comment-6271</link>
		<dc:creator>OsMoSiS &#187; Un NAS in casa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 09:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagemojo.com/?page_id=122#comment-6271</guid>
		<description>[...] Questo filesystem è l&#8217;ideale per un file server e credo che sarà la mia scelta per il NAS, ora ho da capire quale hardware è supportato da OpenSolaris e quanto mi costerà crearmi il server. L&#8217;unica grossa limitazione che vedo, per ora, è che le condivisioni si possono esportare solo in NFS, quindi è necessario installare i servizi Unix in Windows. Qualche link per informazioni su ZFS: Home page del progetto ZFS Benchmark comparativo tra UFS, ZFS, ext3, ReiserFS http://storagemojo.com/?page_id=122  Tags: filesystem, nas, storage, zfs &#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Questo filesystem è l&#8217;ideale per un file server e credo che sarà la mia scelta per il NAS, ora ho da capire quale hardware è supportato da OpenSolaris e quanto mi costerà crearmi il server. L&#8217;unica grossa limitazione che vedo, per ora, è che le condivisioni si possono esportare solo in NFS, quindi è necessario installare i servizi Unix in Windows. Qualche link per informazioni su ZFS: Home page del progetto ZFS Benchmark comparativo tra UFS, ZFS, ext3, ReiserFS <a href="http://storagemojo.com/?page_id=122" rel="nofollow">http://storagemojo.com/?page_id=122</a>  Tags: filesystem, nas, storage, zfs &nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.614 seconds -->
