Or at least an IBM’er responds.
Here’s the link from Tony Pearson. Thanks, Tony.
I’m currently enjoying a post-prandial Ouzo, so I’ll hold off on commenting.
And your comments are welcome. Ouzo or not.
Recent Comments
- Nick Pearce on StorageMojo on hiatus
- Golf Channel turns to optical disc-based archive system - DIGISTOR on Amazon’s Glacier secret: BDXL
- Back to school: Bringing enterprise data archiving principles to higher education - DIGISTOR on Amazon’s Glacier secret: BDXL
- Top 15 Enterprise Networking Experts To Follow | Cato Networks on Liqid’s composable infrastructure
- Jay W Chapman on Hospital ship Haven in Nagasaki, Japan, 1945
- Casey Ryback on StorageMojo on hiatus
- John Aiken on Building a 1.8 exabyte data center
- [Mr. Carlson] Arreglar refrigerador - la-tecnologia.com on Google’s Disk Failure Experience
- Raid Vs - Raid Vs Backup - Inap on Home RAID vs backup?
Recent Posts
Oh, dear – while Tony doesn’t seem to be parrying vigorously (as Seagate, Hitachi, and Chunk were doing), his contribution sounds more like IBM marketing than the kind of detailed, technical response one might have hoped for (‘Maxstore’? the suggestion that 43% of the failed disks in the CMU study were replaced for reasons similar to those that cause people to trade in perfectly functional cars? well, he *is* a manager, and a marketing one at that, so perhaps we shouldn’t expect more).
I’ll add a comment about Chuck in the post below devoted to him.
– bill